For months, the minister, Australia`s cabinet, has been grappling with population growth in Sydney and Melbourne as the controversial new immigration policy of "five years in remote areas" has caused a stir and raised opposition without introducing a controversial new immigration policy.
Under such conditions, we certainly do not like the fact that immigrants to Australia are interested in the livable nature of the cities. Why should they be forced to move to remote areas of the Hong Kong Immigration Council?.
Richard Marles, a front-row lawmaker, "threw cold water" on the proposal. It is not feasible to force immigrants to live in certain areas.
But on the 25th of yesterday, the population minister Alan Tudge spilled the bucket of cold water back, saying, "the latest new visa deal will be officially announced in recent months!"
1. The new policy will be announced before the next general election, and immigration will become a political chip again
In an interview with Sky News yesterday, the population minister Alan Tudge promised to release the latest national population policy by May next year, which includes the controversial "five-year compulsory residence of new immigrants in remote areas."
Asked by the media for more detailed information, Alan Tudge also said, "the biggest problem in Australia right now is that all population growth is in Melbourne, Sydney and southeast Queensland, and the population is growing very fast."
In August, Alan Tudge said Australia had introduced one hundred and eleven thousand nine hundred and ninety nine skilled immigrants in 2017, but 87 percent lived in Melbourne and Sydney.
"that is why we are studying the issue carefully to see if we can provide further incentives for new immigrants to want to go to smaller states, such as South Australia, before considering other visa conditions. They were asked to stay there for five years, and they settled there before they became citizen. "
At the end of the interview, Alan Tudge added as if he couldn`t wait. "soon, there will be news in a few months."
Even as everyone doubts the viability of the new policy, the, Alan Tudge`s decisiveness and timing (before next year`s election) makes one wonder whether Australian immigration has once again become a political chip.
2. Two out of three people resist new immigrants and support the new deal, according to big city statistics in Australia.
What do the residents already living in these big cities think of as the new policy sharpens its way of life?
On the 24th, ReachTel conducted a survey of Sydney people and found that more than two-thirds of Sydney people thought, "We don`t need more new immigrants!" 66.4 percent said new immigrants should go to live in remote areas of the new state. Don`t come to the city! Otherwise, Australia`s largest city is even more crowded.
Indeed, Sydney`s concerns are not unfounded. In April, the latest (ABS) demographic data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics showed that the population density of the four areas of Sydney was comparable to that of the world`s major cities.
Sydney`s Silverwater area, with a population of 1773 people per square kilometre, is close to the urban area of New York in terms of population density.
Maroubra has a population density of 5591 persons per square kilometre, the closest population density to London (5600 persons per square kilometre)
The population density of Paddington-Moore Park (4394 people / km2) is the closest to that of Yokohama (4400 people / km2) in Tokyo.
The Concord-Mortlake-Cabarita district (3706 persons / km2) is the closest to Paris in terms of population density (3700 persons / km2)
But it`s not as crowded as Melbourne`s population density. Downtown Melbourne is Australia`s most densely populated community! There are 19000 people per square kilometre! Sydney is not as crowded as Melbourne.
The density of the red. It looks scary.
New state governor Gladys Berejiklian also announced his willingness to work with Prime Minister Morrison to discuss how to deal with Sydney`s population of explosion.
She wants Sydney to be a "better city" rather than a "bigger city". "there is no doubt that people feel that population growth is their concern, and I am also worried," she said. Because we want a better state and a better city, not necessarily a bigger city or a bigger state. "
The traffic aspect that everyone is constantly complaining about.
Gladys Berejiklian said there would be a "turning point" in 18 months, and Sydney weary of urban construction would eventually experience a range of benefits.
After the new immigration policy comes into effect, don`t just drive the migrants away without adding any infrastructure.
One of the biggest causes of congestion in Australia`s urban population is that infrastructure is not up to date. Australia`s "procrastination" is known to be famous for its "procrastination".
It takes nine workers to repair a manhole cover.
Nothing to smoke a cigarette, refreshing like a fairy.
Exaggerate a little bit more, go to work to sleep directly to show you.
Woke up? It`s okay. Smile and go back to sleep.
In the editor`s opinion, even to shorten the commute 15 minutes, you can give these lovely workers in Tai to O, you can build 15 years.
3. The Australian Immigration Council strongly opposes that the new government may stifle immigration values.
Of course, this new deal caused a lot of opposition, the Australian Immigration Council (AMC) called on the government to be cautious, vigorously promote the relocation of new immigrants to small towns in the less developed regions, but will have an early impact on Australia`s economic growth.
Australian Immigration Council President Carla Wilshire also said that now many immigrants will always have professional skills only in big cities can be maximized, you let them go to the suburbs, is to stifle the possibility of these immigrants to contribute to Australia!
"I can also understand why Sydney is opposed to the influx of migrants, but by restricting immigration, there is no solution to the problem of underdeveloped infrastructure and urban transportation."
As Carla Wilshire points out, the key to the new immigration policy is to return to the region`s social infrastructure.
Even if the population minister Alan Tudge is confident that it will release details of the new deal in the next few months, these suburbs are seriously inadequate in terms of social functions and facilities in the near future.
The new policy may be kicked out before next year`s election, but it will take time for regional equipment to be completed (given the efficiency of Big Earth Australia).
You want new immigrants to the suburbs, the place is good, the conditions are good, of course! But you have nothing, let new immigrants find their own way, this is not immigrants, called pioneers.
4. Editor`s conclusion
In the view of many people, the "policy of catching up immigrants to go to the countryside" is a way to cure the symptoms rather than the root causes, and solve the temporary problems. But what about the next five years?. After five years of living in the suburbs and in the city, those who should have returned to Melbourne, or Sydney, should have returned to Melbourne after five years of living in the suburbs. And five years later, every year, new immigrants continue to enter.
Without enough supporting measures in remote areas and infrastructure in big cities, the future suburbs will only see a quinquennial talent cut off a cliff, and cities will only be more crowded than they are now.
More afraid of the five-year period, a new prime minister and a change of mind, immigration policy said change, no one has confidence to stay in the suburbs for five years.
