What we usually call a 189 or 190 permanent resident visa itself will never expire, but the Australian entry and exit permit is valid for only five years, which is what we often call the five-year PR validity.
As Jason, a gold-medal immigration consultant at NewStars, said in a PR collection earlier: "all the first PR visas have five-year entry and exit permits. After five years, you will have to apply for 155 (or 157) depending on the length of time you live in and your contact with Australia. "
For more explanations and questions about the 155 residents' round trip visa, please read the article: one person in the "immigration prison" can renew his or her family's visa! Accurately calculate the residence time of naturalization and make effective use of 155 round trip visa
Even though the permanent visa itself is indefinite, if PR, who has not been in Australia for a long time after obtaining his status, wants to return here again, it is likely not to be turned away. Because the 155 visa states that the applicant has to have a major business, cultural, employment or personal connection with Australia, where have you been away for such a long time?
This is why we carefully and carefully calculate the living time, fear that not meeting the housing requirements will lead to unable to return to Australia, endure the so-called "immigration prison."
If you are not in Australia for five consecutive years or more, you will have to prove a "compelling reason" in order to get a 155 visa to return to Australia. You don't have to be forced to stay overseas, but you have to prove that the reason for doing so is "convincing" or "strong". So what's the reason to get through it?
What is the compelling reason behind a story that PR, who hasn't been in Australia for 17 years, miraculously won a 155 visa?
More than 30 years ago, Cirillo and his wife emigrated to Australia, where they lived for 12 years until 1995, when the family returned to Italy.
Why? Because his wife was injured in a car accident and suffered from depression during the treatment, doctors advised her to feel more family warmth and contact with her biological parents and extended families.
So Cirillo gave up years of life in Australia and returned to Italy with his wife and children for 17 years.
Uh. In fact, not all of these 17 years have been used to take care of his wife. After her illness, he found out that his daughter had found a son-in-law who had little success in finding a job. He couldn't afford to live in a house even if he couldn't find a job, and he couldn't help it. Dad can only work hard to build their own house, and then because of a variety of horse-catching plot, the house built for a long time.
When the house was finished, two grandchildren were born, and he had to stay in Italy in order to watch them grow up.
To put it simply, because of his cultural background, he is a man who attaches great importance to his family and cannot return to Australia without his wife and children!
A good man who loves his family and takes care of his family. That's why you think it's "convincing?" The Immigration Department doesn't think so, and neither does AAT, but the judge of the Federal Circuit Court believes it!
Judge Neville of the Federal Circuit Court said AAT had made a judicial mistake. For, huh? Because they didn't put themselves in the shoes of Cirillo. If you are in the same cultural background as Cirillo, the normal person will make the same decision. So the judge believed that Cirillo had a "compelling" reason not to return to Australia for 17 years, and granted him an exceptional visa to travel to and from Australia!
Incidentally, some people left a message to cite another example. 11 years after leaving Australia, they also sought 155 visas to return to Australia on similar grounds, such as "can't leave their families," take care of their families, "and so on. Is the family cause to escape the "immigration prison" of the good (jie) by (kou)?
The editor believes that the family is indeed a very important factor for some PR not to return to Australia, but this reason is not readily available, and it is also very difficult to return to Australia again, so it is not a last resort. Let's go the usual way.
