News
 Travel
 Hotels
 Tickets
 Living
 Immigration
 Forum

Don't underestimate Australian spouse immigration visa applications: high risk, high rejection rate

 
[Family Migration]     18 Mar 2018
In the eyes of many people, spouse immigration is the most direct visa application, husband and wife, lover, spouse both things, can the Australian Immigration Service find out? There are other people who think that I married my spouse and signed up. What's the reason why I'm not granted a visa from the Immigration Service? Why not give me a visa? can't we have a permanent separation? In fact, as ...

In the eyes of many people, spouse immigration is the most direct visa application, husband and wife, lover, spouse both things, can the Australian Immigration Service find out? There are other people who think that I married my spouse and signed up. What's the reason why I'm not granted a visa from the Immigration Service? Why not give me a visa? can't we have a permanent separation? In fact, as long as the Immigration Service does not say that one spouse is an Australian citizen or permanent resident, the other spouse can automatically obtain Australian permanent resident status, then, since a visa is required, someone will be approved and some rejected.

Therefore, it must be wrong to assume that a spouse visa is taken for granted after marriage. In particular, in recent years, Australia's skilled immigrant visa and other immigration visa categories have become increasingly high threshold, at the same time, from September 14, 2009, Australia's "black people" if there is a real spouse relationship, It can also be changed from "black" to "white" through spousal immigration, so more and more people are getting permanent residence in Australia through spousal immigrants' fake marriage. For a moment, Li Kui and Li ghost both appear, which is true, which is false, let the immigration board mind-boggling. Visa processing has also been extended from 9 to 12 months, to the most recent 12 to 15 months, or even longer. There is a saying that by extending the trial time, allowing some untrue relationships, can not withstand the test of time, in the final trial exposed.

On the other hand, the following data do show the increasing number of (allegations) reports of false materials, false statements and false relationships received by the Immigration Board in previous years. This also explains why the Migration Board is careful to hear each application and to substantially slow it down. (http://www.immi.gov.au/About/foi/Documents/FA140400696.PDF)

In addition to extending the hearing time, the Immigration Board released the reporting channel, allowing insiders to report information about fake spouses. The author suspects that a large number of reports, I am afraid, are provided by the former spouse of the applicant or guarantor. Http://www.immi.gov.au/Help/Pages/immigration-dob-in-service.aspx.

At the same time, the Immigration Department in visa processing methods are also much stricter than before. For example: in some cases, they take more than two interview surveys to test the authenticity of the applicant's relationship from different perspectives. Sometimes, even without saying hello, you visit the applicant directly. Some real couples, spouses are likely to be rejected due to improper preparation of materials, inconsiderate answers to questions, indiscreet.

Taking January 1-December 31, 2013, for example, MRT (has now merged into AAT) of a total of 972 spouse visa rejection cases reviewed by the Appeals Chamber, 469 cases were overturned by MRT, accounting for 48 percent of all reviewed spouse visa refusal cases. It is conceivable that the applicants in these 469 cases, if not appealed, would "die" in the immigration department's visa application session.

Therefore, the applicant should attach importance to the difficulty of spouse visa application, fight a prepared battle, eliminate the problem in the bud, and avoid mistakes that should not be made. For example, some applicants, because they are not familiar with the visa preparation requirements, the evidence provided and the questions answered are not essential or contradictory; some believe that providing a pile of photos or a photo of the marriage of two people is proof of the relationship between the husband and wife; Others think that when it comes to proving the economic relationship between the two sides, they must provide a joint account. As long as there is a joint account, whether used or not, it does not matter, and so on a lot of misinterpretation of policy.

Post a comment