Summary of previous feelings
The new deal, announced on April 1, 2018, to double the income of parents' immigrant guarantors, has caused great controversy in the Australian Chinese community. After 40 days and nights of argument by various Australian Chinese associations, the media, immigration agencies, and organizations such as the parent Visa Rights League, which was launched rapidly for the incident, the Turnball government finally announced yesterday. The implementation of the new deal may be abandoned and amendments are scheduled to be submitted by May 23.
Event Review:
On March 26, 2018, the Turnbull government, without any community debate or consultation, made drastic changes to the demands of the "support guarantee" (Assurance Of Support) for immigrant families, and the facts began on April 1, 2018.
Take, for example, the most applied parent visa 143:
The doubling of the income of parents' immigrant guarantors in the New deal has caused a great deal of controversy, especially in the Australian Chinese community.
Boycotting the New deal against parents visa rights alliance was established rapidly, signed petitions launched one after another.
On May 9,2018, the press reported that the turnball government would cancel the parents' return to the guarantor's income, such as doubling the new deal, so as not to lose in the Senate poll. The amendment was said to be re-submitted by 23 May or before the restoration.
The voice of Tang Lin's law firm
If in April 2017, Australian Prime Minister Turnbull "has lost his credit" on a 457 visa, "Australia's work belongs to Australians," and so on, the abolition of the 457 system (which was put into effect in March 2018) can be understood relatively for the time being. So April 1 April Fool's Day issued the parents immigration guarantors review the new policy is quite funny.
Tang Lin law firm also pays special attention to this incident. In an exclusive interview with the Chinese channel SBS on April 27, our immigration department, lawyer Xinjing Leung, said: "according to the legitimate reasonableness of the new policy, our success rate of the petition must have been, and even be optimistic," he said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese channel SBS on April 27. "Australia is a mature state of law, and we have to abide by it before the new deal is overthrown," he said. Before the petition is successful and the bill is overturned, the Immigration Board will follow the new policy to examine the qualifications of parents' guarantors. "
The Chinese are the countries with the most concept of "family". Just as the word "country" in Chinese has a word "home", which is not found in many western languages. Because of the different cultural and historical background, the western countries pay more attention to the value realization and power guarantee of every citizen, which is very different from the cultural values of China. Since ancient times, Chinese parents have looked forward to their sons and daughters, and Chinese children also believe that their greatest success is to eventually be able to accompany their families and allow them to enjoy their old age.
As an only-child generation, Chinese parents do everything they can for their children to study abroad and establish a family. As a child, the first thing to do overseas will be to find ways to reunite old parents with themselves. In Australia, parents pay for immigration applications have become the best, or even the only choice for most children to stay in Australia. Therefore, the reform has surprised and puzzled many permanent residents of Australia, especially Chinese groups.
Related visas:
在澳洲众多有关父母移民签证类别里，以下三个签证类别都允许父母在澳大利亚境外递交签证申请，为境外父母提供了申请上的便利:
Parental immigration visas (category 103);
Donor-parent migration (143);
Temporary visas for migrants of contributing parents (category 173);
It is worth noting that the three types of parental immigration visas are required to meet two prerequisites:
1. The child has permanent residence in Australia, citizenship or qualified New Zealand citizen residing permanently in Australia;
2. The Family balance Test (Balance-of-family test), requires one of the following requirements:
A at least half of the children live permanently in Australia, o
B there are more children living permanently in Australia than in other countries