A few days ago, programmers locked up servers and computers and maliciously disappeared, eventually leading to the collapse of start-up companies. The founders, with millions of debts, continued to swipe their screens. January 24, 2001. The author published an article entitled "the disclaimer statement of former employees of a collapsed technology company", which refutes numerous accusations and network rumors one by one. Is the plot going to be reversed this time?
Event passing
A "report to all the players in the game industry" pushed Yan, a start-up company, to the climax of public opinion. This article accused Yan of taking office in Shenzhen Crab Network Technology Co., Ltd for three months, out of retaliation. Missing and locking up computers and servers on the day of online testing eventually led to a two-year project that failed and suffered heavy losses, and founder Yoon started working on millions of debts.
As soon as this article goes out, many people have expressed sympathy to Yin Mou, even some people hope can transfer money to Yin Mou to help him pay off his debt as soon as possible. But there are also questions about the veracity of a company's bankruptcy, which is most likely to be attributed to management and institutions, and to employees who are more likely to be thrown out of the pot. In addition, there is a lack of logic in the bulletin letter, such as the failure to test the day does not cause the game to fail.
In response, Yin himself then personally filmed a video as a response. In the video, Yin said that when things happened still insisted on saving the product, in order to prevent the market from questioning the product, so the matter was not disclosed at that time; to the netizens who wish to donate, expressed their gratitude and received it; The company originally had a very good back-end process, but due to poor health to resign home to rest and recuperation, temporarily recruited Yan into the job, not clear inspection.
At the end of the video, Yin shouted: "my crab game is now dead, so what, I have more hair than you, my wife also gave me a lovely big fat boy, do you have it?" You 40-year-old single dog! "
Yan responded.
On January 24, Yan published a long article in response to the various accusations and network rumors mentioned in Yin Mou, founder of Shenzhen Crab Network Technology Co., Ltd., in the Book of Teach to all the players in the Game Industry, and said that all the accusations and network rumors were rebutted one by one, and that all see you on court. I believe that law will return a fair, specific rebuttal as follows: (attached to the end of the article Yan in response to a screenshot of a long article)
Regarding the online rumor that "lock up the server and run away directly," Yan said in response that at that time, the server program crashed, was doing problem handling, and the responsible person had to hold a meeting temporarily, so he left his work at hand. In the middle of the way, several colleagues came to Yin to talk about the work, because the work at hand was not finished, so Mr. Yan continued to go back to the work station to deal with it, and then because he was writing the code on his hand, the train of thought was not separated, and he did not pass (the meeting) in time, and after that, Yin said an insult. Yan did not resist a quarrel with it, although not on time to work in the afternoon, but also did not run away, back to the company to repair the server program fault to normal operation test.
On the statement of "locking the server and the computer," Yan responded in a long article that he only used the lock screen password, and Yin also knew the password, and released the test to the outside world on other companies' cloud servers. All cloud servers are registered by Yin, cell phone number email is Yin, even if the password is lost, make a phone call can be recovered.
On the issue of "refusing to hand over" what Yin said, Yan said in his response that as a result of the quarrel with Yin on the same day, the test was completed, Yin asked for someone to complete the handover and leave on the same day, and the password and the corresponding documents were all handed over. Yin confirmed with the handover, Yan just left, and put forward several colleagues saw.
In response to the statement that "the project could not be tested normally because of Yan's absence," Yan responded that it was pure nonsense, that the test time could be adjusted, and that even if it could not be tested on the same day, it could issue a public announcement for everyone to test tomorrow.
On the issue of "later going back to beg for reinstatement for the provident fund," Yan said that it was Yin himself who offered to eat on the evening of December 23, 2017, and in the process invited Yan to join the company again. After Yan refused to do so, Yin started threat Gallie, saying, "if the game fails, do nothing next life will kill you." Yan said that this part of the text message, can be presented on the court.
Main doubt
The two sides insisted on the matter, and many netizens began to eat melon rationally. On V2EX and Zhihu, a large number of netizens began to discuss the matter, and the main contradictions focused on the following aspects:
1, why didn't you call the police about locking the server?
Although the founder mentioned in the announcement that Yan had been to the company twice to make trouble, and even fought with the people's Congress to stop it, eventually triggering the police, he did not mention the alarm concerning the lock-up of the server and the computer by Yan. Some netizens think this has constituted the alarm level. Because the code on the server and computer is an important asset of the company and has a bearing on the success or failure of the project, there is good reason to call the police immediately if you lock up the server and cause the project to fail.
2, the server and computer account have only one main line to know?
According to the information transmitted by the announcement, only one person knows the password of the server and computer, but Yan retorts that Yin himself knows the password and can change the password at any time. Many netizens also have questions about this, regarding the software company. To prevent single-point problems, the most important assets are generally not in the hands of individuals.
3, no alternative
Users pointed out that if, as stated in the announcement, Yan's personal behavior led to the bankruptcy of the company, then there was no alternative to the project, a programmer would be enough to abort the project, and the risk of the project would be too high. As an independent game developer (in the announcement), the crab server is only one-person implementation is unthinkable. Some users believe that this is precisely the characteristics of start-up companies, the company system is not perfect, inadequate staffing, it is easy to occur this situation.
4. Why are you sending a bulletin letter?
The announcement letter is called "notify all the game industry benevolent book," the content is to throw fault on Yan Mou body, Yin Mou this most direct purpose is to let Yan in the game industry can not be based on, It was strange to send this bulletin letter after such a long time. Yan explained that Yin likes threat others, reported a strong heart, said "next life to do nothing to kill you" and left evidence. It is worth mentioning that Zhihu also has anonymous netizens for the company's technical staff, but also by Yin similar to threat, can be used as collateral evidence.
Expert comments on law
In response to the dispute, the editorial office of InfoQ consulted partners at Beijing's lawer firm and columnist Chou Jiade lawer, Zhou lawer, columnist for Polar time, law 42, said:
In fact, the law issue involved in this incident is still relatively clear. First, let's take a look at the contents of the book of affections to all the players in the game industry. In the evaluation of Yan, he used "the city government is quite deep, the mind is different from the ordinary people," and "wanton action". Description of "the employee's bad deeds," and finally called for contact with more victims of the company, in order to solicit the person's "bad deeds" incident. This involves the reputation rights of Yan, the publisher needs to have evidence to prove that the text is a fact, otherwise constitutes a tort. Once found to be a tort by the court, the publisher may be required to bear the law liability to stop the infringement, restore its reputation, eliminate the impact, apologize, and compensate for the loss. In the actual situation, it is difficult for the publisher to produce sufficient evidence to prove the subjective damage evaluation of someone, and the possibility of bearing tort is great.
From the event described by the company itself, if the company has evidence to prove that Yan's behavior has caused significant losses to the company, it is entirely possible to ask Yan to bear liability for the loss caused by his actions by means of law.
On the other hand, if the staff members intentionally delete the word "modification" through "interference", they may be liable for the crime of destroying the computer information system if the computer system is not functioning properly and the consequences are serious. If the publisher deliberately fabricates the publication of fictional facts, it is sufficient to derogate from others' personality, damage others' reputation, and if the circumstances are serious, it may also constitute criminal liability for defamation.
In short, I don't agree with what the company or the founder sees on the network. The solution to the problem needs to be solved on the law track through law, and the law road is clear.
Attached is a screenshot of a long article written by Yan to refute a rumor.
