News
 Travel
 Hotels
 Tickets
 Living
 Immigration
 Forum

141 country visa-free regular travel passport? It's the most skilled fishing rumor this year.

In the past two days, the news of the "Ministry of Foreign Affairs pushing regular brigade passports: visa-free for Euro-Korean Aussie 141 countries" began to spread on the Internet on a large scale. When some netizens even quarreled over the strange rule that "regular travel passports are only open to first-tier city residents," Ai Fan's anti-fake team felt that they could no longer sit back and ignore it. This article will reveal the truth one by one for everyone. I'll tell you what a fake story is.

This news cable for "Sina Tourism News," Sina's name undoubtedly dispelled many people's doubts. However, we did not find the original report on Sina Travel, which appears on other platforms only in reprinted form. But the report mentioned that "the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Immigration Administration of the Ministry of Public Security jointly held a press conference in Beijing yesterday." so big news, only one media reported that the rest of the media were reproduced? CCTV, the people's network reported.

Let's take a look at the "regular Travel Passport" that appears in the article:

Using the search engine's map recognition function, we found this image:

(this figure appears around 2012, and the picture is from: Quora)

Please join us to find trouble: the two pictures only have the passport on the right and whether the girl with the passport wears glasses or not. The pictures used in the report are also marked with "Sina Travel" Logo..

At the same time, Wikipedia has appeared on the "frequent passenger passport" entry, but was soon labeled as "highly suspicious" information.

On the basis of bold assumptions and careful verification, we also looked at the official websites of the Immigration Administration of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Public Security. We did not find any relevant news, but we found something new: according to the official website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, The head of the consular department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs should be Guo Shaochun, but the "Director-General of the Consular Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs" in the report is Qiong Qianzhen.

Original report:

Is that gay reporter hand cancer? But when I manually typed in the name "Qiongqianzhen," it seemed to me that I had discovered something secret:

Again look at this troublesome "reporter" Fu Yiming, please read out loud: rich-moved-people. I seem to see the sarcastic face of the author of this article.

Still, I picked up my cell phone and dialed it-the consular department's phone, asking about the so-called regular travel passport, and the answer was, "not clear." The official Weibo of the Foreign Ministry's Office of Public diplomacy, diplomatic PHS, did not release any news.

At this point, we have been able to conclude that the report is onion news. In fact, when we carefully examine the original text, we can also find a lot of untenable logic. For example, the requirement that "the first regular travel passports will be open to first-tier city registered permanent residence residents" is totally nonsense. Because visa-free treatment is granted to citizens of a certain country or region, it has never been said only to residents of a province or city.

It seems that every once in a while, the news that "there are more XX visa-free countries in Chinese passports" will appear on the Internet, so that unknown netizens think that they can really make a "go-go" trip. But tears often fall when you know the truth.

If this kind of news is just the headline party before, the news of the regular travel passport is a truthful lie. Because there are so many reprint platforms, we cannot verify the true source of the news, but no matter for any purpose, publishing such false news is extremely immoral, and the media should also think twice before forwarding it. After all, there is a bias in the report, but it is responsible.

QRcode:
 
 
Reply