News
 Travel
 Hotels
 Tickets
 Living
 Immigration
 Forum

Swedish prosecutors' findings on the eviction of Chinese tourists from hotels are fresh

In response to the September 17 incident in which Swedish police brutally treated Chinese tourists, Sweden's chief prosecutor, Eriksson (Mats Ericsson), said:

After careful investigation, there is no fault in Swedish police enforcement, no police violence against them.

The scene video shows that after the police took them away in a car, they finally put the three of them in front of the church door, which is dedicated to hosting refugees, nearby the passenger station, but do not know why. Mr. Zeng ran to the park a few hundred meters away to take several photographs of the cemetery.

The only police complaint point turned out to be this way.

Previous (non-event) travel photos of Zeng's family


As the heat escalated, the Swedish response began to appear in the Europe and America media.

(I) Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Swedish Foreign Ministry spokesman Nelson Patric Nilsson said today that the Swedish police are independent executive bodies and that Sweden's government cannot and should not be involved in such an investigation.


(2) Hotel side

In response to an interview with the Swedish local newspaper Aftonbladet, the management of the hotel's Generator Hostel, published in the British media The Guardian, said:

All we know is that we did everything we could to help this guest, but at the same time, we can't accept our employees being threat and placing other guests in such a threat environment.

In response to US media interviews, the hotel side also said that the family arrived at midnight, almost 14 hours earlier than the time they could stay, and that they had mistakenly booked a day's less room, but the hotel was full. Before the conflict escalated, the hotel also tried to help the family find another hotel, but when asked to leave, the family not only refused, but also loudly made language and limb threat. So that the called hotel security felt out of control, so called the police.


(III) Swedish police

The police report showed that the family refused to leave around 01:45.

About 25 minutes later, the police decided to take coercive measures.

The police report also confirmed that tourists have been screaming for people, shouting police killings, etc., as shown by the video of passers-by.

In response to the Chinese allegations, Swedish police told US media that the incident had long been referred to independent prosecutors to assess whether the family had been mistakenly treated by (mistreated).


(IV) Office of the Independent Prosecuto

The Swedish prosecutor's office, (Swedish Prosecution Authority), told U. S. reporters that there was no evidence of any mistake by the police in treating the family, and that they had issued such a statement:

The Independent Public Prosecutor's Office has assessed whether there was a crime, and it is important to note that the investigation does not equate with the appropriateness of some practices or the best way to deal with the situation at the time. In the handling of Chinese tourists, the independent inspection office ruled that the police had not committed any criminal acts, and therefore would not initiate an investigation.

The Associated Press quoted Swedish local media Aftonbladet as saying that Swedish Chief Prosecutor Mats Ericsson told the media that the investigation of the police had already ended on September 7, and the assessment was that the Swedish police were not at fault.

Prosecutor Eriksson claimed that "when there is disorder, it is very normal, and it is a very common and standardized procedure, and the police have the power to move one person from one place to another."

And for the family's son, who told the outside world that the police had used physical violence, Mats Ericsson said that the police practice was supported by article 13 of the Police Act, that they used standardized measures, and that the family had refused to leave the place where they had no right to stay. This is very disturbing.

It is clear that Swedish prosecutors have officially closed the case despite China's rare and ever loud protest.


Extended reading:

Sweden: Mr. Zeng admits to lying, the truth surfaced

In the past few days, Mr. Zeng, who shouted "Swedish police killed people" in fluent English, has suddenly become an online celebrity. In the first two days, to be honest, I saw the news that three Chinese tourists were thrown away by Swedish police in the first two days, and I couldn't help but scold: Mahler compared, deceiving people too much!

However, as the truth came to the surface, he reprimanded himself: why was I fooled again?

According to Mr. Zeng's latest statement, he has admitted to the press that he lied, leading to false media coverage.

News is false, it is a fatal injury to the media, leaving the facts, everything is a cloud.

At the beginning of the interview, Mr. Tsang did not know whether he was deliberately or ashamed to express himself, hiding the following two facts:

First, the Swedish hotel was not impersonal. The hotel staff not only granted Mr. Zeng's request to stay in the lobby for the time being, but also turned down the background music of the hall more humanely. For fear of disturbing the two old people.

Second, Mr. Tsang claimed to have settled his parents in the lobby and went out to look for a nearby hotel, but instead of finding a hotel, he took a single woman back to the hotel hall in the middle of the night to rest. The hotel rejected the young woman's rest in the hotel lobby and questioned Mr. Zeng's motives, arguing that her safety had been met with threat and that the hotel had chosen to call the police without being able to drive out of the family of three. (it was later found that the woman Mr. Zeng brought back was Mr. Zeng's wife. The family moved in first and then brought others into the hotel in the middle of the night. The so-called female students of the compatriots were nothing more than the awe-inspiring guise that Mr. Zeng had used to build the momentum.)

Third, instead of throwing the three members of Mr. Tseng's family at the cemetery, the police put them in a church in the city centre that accommodates refugees 24 hours a day. Mr. Zeng had only failed because he had tried to take advantage of the fact that there were graves in the church to cover up the truth. I have to admire is a master power, ah, the above three points, the paper can not hold fire, have to confess.

Personal, kidnap the patriotic enthusiasm of the Chinese, lose the face of the people in the world, infidelity;

It is not only not to take care of comforting parents, but also to record videos and take photos to expose their parents' face to people all over the world and to show their filial piety to the people all over the world.

Hotel has been accommodated, ungrateful, on the contrary, to put forward additional requirements, affecting the hotel quiet, also not benevolent;

Lying to the media and embassies that help them, so much so that the truth comes to light that the media and embassies are passive, that is, to bring the media and embassies into the ditch, unjustifiably!

Such infidelity, unfilial, unkind behavior, actually triggered a "patriotic frenzy."

Is Mr. Zeng too powerful, or is it easy to be kidnapped and used by some people who lack reason?

Mr. Zeng's identity has been revealed online: the former general manager of Tianshili's Nigerian company abroad, whose parents have a record of crying and wailing at the airport, is actually playing around in the name of a business trip.

QRcode:
 
 
Reply