At a restaurant last night, I went to a non-sexless test. When I flew overseas last week, I also used a gender-free toilet on the plane. I didn't think twice about it.
To be honest, this should be the direction of development in the future.
One of the main aims of establishing such gender-neutral bathrooms is to achieve "gender inclusion", where many transgender people are subjected to violence and difficulties in entering gender-specific areas.
Surprisingly, 80 percent of Herald Sun readers disagreed in an online survey as more and more public places turned to gender-equal latrines.
It also reminds me that some people portray this as suspicious-suggesting that girls using the toilet may have a "creepy guy" next to them.
Transgender people, of course, are not creepy; they just don't fit directly into male or female categories, and they need another option.
I think other situations are acceptable, such as placing slogans based on where the toilet is located: "gender diversity is welcome here," but toilets are still divided between men and women.
When I met some sex-neutral toilets in 2016, I didn't understand what had happened. This is in a Brunswick cinema, one door is a man (there is a urinal and cubicle), the other is a woman (it only has a small room). However, the signs say: "anyone can use the toilet, regardless of gender identity or expression."
I made a mistake, went in and saw a man in the urinal. The problem is that it's not without sexism.