News
 Travel
 Hotels
 Tickets
 Living
 Immigration
 Forum

Australian students beat up Asian mentors! One class four times in a row! Courtship plus points are ruthlessly rejected by mentors! Insist that the mentor targeted him!

 
[Education News]     20 Apr 2018
These days the teacher is also a high-risk profession, as soon as not paying attention to by the students a fat beat-up!

These days the teacher is also a high-risk profession, as soon as not paying attention to by the students a fat beat-up!

Recently, an Australian college student, because the test result is not good linked 4 times, ran to ask the teacher to ask for affection, but by the teacher ruthlessly rejected, despairs unexpectedly the teacher to beat up a meal!

Australian students beat up Asian mentors! One class four times in a row! Courtship plus points are ruthlessly rejected by mentors! Insist that the mentor targeted him!

According to reports, Ali Mohammad, an engineering student at Griffith University, failed another exam in early March, and this is the fourth time he has dropped out of the course. Desperate Mohammad classmates ran to Jeung-Hwan Doh, the teacher of the course, to plead with him. I hope Mr. Doh can give him a few points to pass him, but Mr. Doh refused his request, this classmate decided that the Asian teacher must be discriminating against him, against him!

Australian students beat up Asian mentors! One class four times in a row! Courtship plus points are ruthlessly rejected by mentors! Insist that the mentor targeted him!

Angry Mohammad snarled at Mr. Doh, slapping Mr. Doh in the face with his hand, and then hitting the instructor on the head with a test roll. When school security officers arrived, Mohammad fled the campus.

Australian students beat up Asian mentors! One class four times in a row! Courtship plus points are ruthlessly rejected by mentors! Insist that the mentor targeted him!

On Tuesday (April 16), at the Southport District Court, Mohammad admitted beating his mentor, Jeung-Hwan Doh, and said he had failed four tests and that Jeung-Hwan Doh had refused to add points to his test results, in desperation. He did such an impetuous act.

After trial, Mohammad pleaded guilty to assault charges and was sentenced to 40 hours of community service.

He admitted in court that his actions were wrong. "at first, I thought he was deliberately targeting me, and now I know he`s wrong. He`s actually teaching me," he said.

Although we sometimes joke that the high school enrollment rate is to generate income, but the high school enrollment rate is often academic rigorous famous schools, which also shows from a side that the quality of teaching is good, teachers are seriously responsible ah!

Recently, there are news reports that Australian university teachers are under unprecedented pressure, although most teachers have not been violently attacked like this Jeung-Hwan Doh. But more and more Australian university teachers are suffering from online violence from students. One of the sources is the school`s teaching evaluation system.

Australian students beat up Asian mentors! One class four times in a row! Courtship plus points are ruthlessly rejected by mentors! Insist that the mentor targeted him!

The original intention of the teaching evaluation system is to evaluate the teacher`s teaching ability through students` feedback on the teacher`s teaching activities, which can not only help teachers to realize the problems in the teaching work, but also improve the teaching content and teaching methods. Encouraging teachers to work hard is also a bridge between teachers and students.

Australian students beat up Asian mentors! One class four times in a row! Courtship plus points are ruthlessly rejected by mentors! Insist that the mentor targeted him!

Many schools now link the student`s assessment to the teacher`s assessment and even decide whether the school will continue to hire the teacher. As a result, teachers will value the results of their own assessment very much.

A recent survey at the University of South Australia found that more than 70% of the teachers interviewed at the university had received bad reviews including racial discrimination, insults and so on, or had received comments from students with offensive and abusive content.

More than half of the teachers who have been insulted feel frustrated and upset; 1/3 is very stressful and depressed, and most of these teachers want to delete these comments, after all, their immediate superiors may be able to read them.

Even a female teacher wept uncontrollably at the mention of what could be called cyber violence.

The University of Queensland did the same survey, and the results were very similar to those of the University of South Australia! Some students will even use bad evaluation to threaten teachers, the teaching evaluation system has lost its original meaning, and even began to put the cart before the horse!

As a result, the National higher Education Alliance (NTEU (National Tertiary Education Union) decided to conduct a national survey on this issue. The alliance asked UniSA to upgrade this flawed, but not very practical, evaluation and feedback system. The coalition believes that before evaluating, students should be warned that the evaluation should not include "personal, racial, sexual or insulting statements that, once they are involved, will be deleted."

It is also suggested that students comment on the classroom should be real-name system, the teacher`s students should at least have to take this course! Or you can choose a student representative to submit an evaluation. According to the point of view, the student evaluation system is like a food review website, and the reviewers are not necessarily representative enough.

Imagine, if you have finished eating in a restaurant, not very satisfied, and not dissatisfied, usually you will not take the initiative to evaluate it? Often it is only when people are very dissatisfied that they want to find a place to comment on their anger.

So how to solve this problem, so that students and teachers are satisfied, let the teaching evaluation system work?

Experts say this may require the introduction of an automated software system to block these manifestly biased and abusive comments.

In fact, 99% of the students feedback is very constructive, teaching evaluation is indeed an important reference tool for teaching improvement and improvement, and this system is only one of the many ways to evaluate the teaching quality of universities.

Australian students beat up Asian mentors! One class four times in a row! Courtship plus points are ruthlessly rejected by mentors! Insist that the mentor targeted him!

The teaching evaluation system can not be used as the only criterion to judge a teacher`s teaching ability. The result of the existing scoring system is actually negative and can only be used as a reference. As a student, no matter how much complaints against the teacher, it is wrong to hit people first or attack people with bad comments.

If you always hang up, shouldn`t you think about whether you`ve really learned all about it? If you really did not learn well, there are teachers against you, should immediately complain to the relevant school departments.

In most cases, students and teachers, sincere advice, active communication, attack the teacher is more effective.

The days passed in the blink of an eye, and soon it will come to the end of the term again. I hope all the students will study hard and pass smoothly!


Post a comment