As the election approached, the two parties almost tried to milk in an attempt to favor the Chinese. In order to create a pro-"Chinese" image, followed by the "Chinese" atmosphere, the two parties party chieftain opened the social app chat mode, so that in the mainstream of society triggered a "social app safe?" An out-of-election dispute.
Recently, Ms. Sun Yining, a professor at the University of Technology in Sydney, wrote an academic article "Is there a problem with WeChat?" due to the invitation of the Australian think tank "China Matters". This article is co-ordinated with the two parties of the ruling and opposition parties, and regards WeChat as the government ` s policy of transmitting to the Australian Chinese society. The effective channel and the escort of WeChat software under the supervision of the CCP in Australia have directly circulated a concept that the CCP is willing to see. That is: As long as the "rules" are followed, WeChat is still very safe. I still don`t know whether this concept is recognized by the mainstream.
But everyone knows that the full-featured self-media social software developed under the direct planning of the CCP is an attractive factor for users. The use of big data to monitor users in all aspects is the key to the authorities. WeChat and Alipay are the most popular convenience tools and are promoted as Chinese characteristics throughout the Chinese world. Applicants must have real names, real personal information, and must also be bound to the applicant`s bank account. After installing this software, whether it is open group chat, private communication, or shopping, go out and walk, the monitor can be seen at a glance. An artist in Beijing said in an interview with Voice of America that "using WeChat is equivalent to streaking." For stability, this is a very effective "enforcement" approach, but as a user, it is clear that human rights have been violated.
So knowing the existence of these crises, the political party chieftain is still willing to borrow the name of others to register and enjoy the use of it? The reason is simple: a general election is imminent, the vote is more important, and security is the second. It is believed that whoever is elected will reopen discussions such as "social app noxious", which is probably the strategy of real-world politicians.
Someone asked, can WeChat be an infiltration of political power? This is a question that is known and asked, and people who say "no" are extremely irresponsible. The WeChat platform is not only filtered by preset keywords, but also monitored by a large network administrator. The entire information network can only operate under the same sound, and can not produce reverse-ear sound, and its ability to brainwash is extremely powerful. For the purpose of a "super selfishness", the government has contributed to the spread of WeChat, giving people the illusion that WeChat is safe, and more and more people have to install WeChat in order to interact with candidates. When politicians are glad that their policies have been spread, another piece of information from the CCP that is bigger and stronger is also being instilled in the minds of Australian users.
Is social app really going to be a good candidate? In fact, politicians are too ignorant of the Chinese. The vast majority of Chinese are not interested in the general election. Moreover, the number of social app groups is strictly restricted, and we are just curious spectators. Only a few people know what politicians say. After many elections, the policies of both parties have been oriented towards the whole society and not towards the Chinese. The so-called "consider for the Chinese" promises are all political games, and the Chinese are not so deceiving.
Politicians always think that face-to-face rhetoric can win the love of Chinese people. Rudd has obtained the Chinese people`s enthusiasm in a national language. In fact, it is a wrong judgment. Due to the guise of history and ideology, there is an inexplicable complex between the Chinese immigrants who grew up under the rule of the Chinese Communist Party and the Australian Labor Party. They have always preferred Labour politicians.
The Liberal Party is therefore worried that after the government introduced the "Anti-infiltration Law", it offended the Chinese Communist Party and alienated the Chinese community. Morrison also had to use WeChat to entangle the Chinese and show the Chinese voters. I think this is an extra move.
There is a common denominator among the citizens of any authoritarian country, that is, they are not used to thinking independently, because when they think independently, they begin to take the path of "crime," and they are used to standing on the side of great power. There is an old saying in China: "the wall falls and everyone pushes", or "the trees fall and the monkeys fall apart."
After the emergence of the "reverse osmosis law", despite the great bumps in the Australian political arena, the Liberal Party apparently overwhelmed the Labour Party in an imposing manner. The once-important Hwang was blocked from the Australian border, and a group of active so-called Chinese associations blew out. The gas ball is pinched, the consulate has tightened the tail and is quiet, etc. Don`t think that the Chinese are unhappy about it. The pleasure in the Chinese mind is just not publicly expressed. Who does not want to see the representative of the party state? Do you have a domineering fix?
In this process, however, the Labour Party has been extremely discontented, not only has the downfall been revealed one by one, but also the veteran Chinese politicians who call the storm have lost their credibility, and the mainstream media has bitten the Labour scandal and will not let go. It is even more exposed that the New State Labour Party party chieftain "two-sided" deceiving Chinese. Chinese may be disappointed with both parties, but since the beginning of this year, it is clear that support has been skewed in favour of the Liberal Party. To please the Chinese, the first thing is to understand the Chinese, the Chinese worship the star politicians, love the successful.
Sun Wanning`s report may be able to generate a little discussion in the mainstream, but the social app platform will not be the voting direction of the change as a whole. That is for sure, but unfortunately, It will bury unpredictable dangers for the future of Australia throughout the election.
