News
 Travel
 Hotels
 Tickets
 Living
 Immigration
 Forum

Is it wrong for the Chinese to believe in 'real estate education'?

"bankruptcy", "default", "disappearance" and other extreme events in the recent Chinese-language media have stirred up the already depressed atmosphere, a letter incident has recently captured the headlines of the major Chinese-language media, "bankruptcy", "default", "disappearance" and so on.

The frequent accidents in the Chinese real estate sector have proved from a point of view that our community is always prone to falling into a frenzy about real estate, and that there will inevitably be various so-called investment actions on the left side of the road, but this can be explained. Are we wrong?

In the last two months, an article called "Zhihu Gaozan: what kind of experience is there at home in a large number of suites in first-tier cities?" frequently appeared in the online media, and the central idea of the article is clear, that is, comparing young people in the United States and Europe. Our generation of Chinese believe in "house teaching", "the persistence of real estate, is a joke."

This article comes from the answer to a question on Zhihu Network, which received nearly 10,000 likes in less than a month. As an initiative to express a higher level of pursuit, it has been reprinted by various literary and artistic official accounts one after another.

If you happen to see this article, and you're reflecting on our obsession with real estate, then take a look at another great answer under the same question, and he thinks the pursuit of real estate is the choice of every specific person. No one can stand on top of morality and criticize others.

The editor believes that the ripping is justified, and in the attitude of "both hearing and understanding", the full text is reproduced below.

Author: Wang Xiao

Source: known

Copyright is owned by the autho

This kind of problem is actually very boring, I have always felt that China's real estate anxiety is mainly hype by media people in the north and Guangzhou. But this thing is a bad book, and we don't go back to it.

But the most indignant, is that this answer actually came out of a "Tianlong", condescending to educate the common people. When the respondent said he had 10 or so suites, shops, homes, hotel apartments, house. in the United States Does not feel how strong oneself, also needn't envy.

I knew that someone had come to share the story they had just made up. So let's see how he made it up?

Are Americans better than houses?

First of all, the so-called respondent skillfully played a language game, that is, a Chinese behavior simplified as "in China", "everyone", "Chinese students."

It is a pity that the eldest brother is not going to be a Western media man. He has mastered the basic Western media reporting technique of "generality".

When you look at the phenomenon from a rational point of view, you will know that not all Chinese people like to talk about houses, cars and brand names. In the same way, not all Americans do not eat fireworks.

The Americans, of course, care about the house! Many American media have reported that houses are too expensive for millennials (1982 / 2000)!

Real estate War: class and Cultural War tear San Francisco apart!

And their "successful people" also like to show off their big house!

I have to say here that the owner of 10 houses in the family is really reincarnated by Jin Hui Di. In fact, Chinese people are not house teaching, nor are Americans concerned about the house. People in America who don't care about houses are the same as those in China who don't care about houses.

When I was studying in the United States, some of my classmates didn't care about the house. His home is old money, 's house is not a distant thing for him, but more will bring the pressure of property tax.

At the same time, I also have a lot of friends concerned about whether they can afford to buy a house. As a result of Obama-era policies, many grass-roots Americans are unable to find a full-time job, making them ineligible to lend to banks to buy homes.

My classmates are not lazy at all. They take three jobs a day, but they can only live in their parents' basement. Do they talk about the house and the car? Of course they talked about it. Do they aspire to the house and the car? Of course they yearn for it.

Then the classmate's sister met a surgeon who was a Texan and told my classmates that he was in charge of buying a house and a car. Then the two people came together because of true love, and received the blessing. The two of them now plan to earn enough money in ten years to start a ranch..

His sister used to order the cheapest meal with us, but now people don't talk about the house anymore. Guess why?

The respondent said he talked to a private entrepreneur in China, who not only bought a house but also a store, a wealth management product, and an investment in equity to make more money. So he thinks the pursuit of the Chinese is not as high as that of the Americans.

So what is the respondent's so-called high pursuit of the Americans? Let's take a look.

All right, here's Zuckerberg. I hope that the future of beauty will be more vigilant, not always Zuckerberg. Keep in mind that many of this generation of American young people are white left. They don't care about Zuckerberg's worth or his contribution. They're more concerned about Facebook's invasion of their privacy.

So Miyao should improve its knowledge in the future, and don't get caught in the old road of talking about Zuckerberg all the time. Zuckerberg, for example, disdains of designer clothing, luxury cars, and multiple properties.

Let me help you sum up some of Za's clothes, cars and real estate.

Let's start with the clothes. Beauties must bear in mind that wearing the same dress doesn't mean it can't be a brand name. Zuckerberg's grey T-shirt is the Brunello Cucinelli, Italian brand, one in $300. 400.

So what to say? "Zuckerberg publicly refused to wear a brand name." This is the boycott that spearheaded a series of old industries and old cultures. " It's like that.

shut up!

The last one to be blown this way was Jobs' black collared sweater. Jobs' sweaters are all St. Croix's, and the reengraved version is worth $225.

So stop saying they don't wear brand clothes, they just wear brand clothes that you haven't heard of. Yeah, it's not just Armani, Donkey and Gucci. in this world. These big brands are expensive in advertising and design fees, and the rich choose these brands because their fabrics are better.

It's that simple.

And don't say that tech tycoons don't pay attention to wearing clothes, sportswear and technology industry has become totem, this is a culture, does not mean that people do not wear formal clothes. Bezos and Zuckerberg wear formal clothes to tell the truth, more than 90% of China's rich. So this kind of beauty blow can rest.

After talking about clothes, let's talk about the house. He has a property in Para Oto.

Look at the picture must feel nothing, as if the middle and upper classes of the United States can handle ah. But how could a rich man's mind be so simple. The most expensive is not the house, but privacy. Although she lived in the house, he bought all the houses around his house. And they have to be dismantled and rebuilt.

And in order to keep his "unpretentious" people, he did not buy the property under his own name, but left it to the Iconiq Capital firm.

You're sure to wonder, is this really going to fool people into thinking he's "plain"? Of course, don't you think the respondent is on the hook?

Are you satisfied with this?

He bought a single house in San Francisco and spent $10 million renovating.

One57, Koza, one of the best apartments in New York, paid $90 million for the 89 and 90 floors.

Leaving America's mainland, Zuckerberg bought 2.83 million square meters of private property in Hawaii, home to beaches and manors, and a fence. Locals told the media that this was neocolonialism.

Well, in this sense, Americans have a higher pursuit than private entrepreneurs in China. The Chinese only want to be landlords, Americans are directly landlords.

Finish talking about the house and the car. Zuckerberg spends most of his time singing about the TSX, Honda Flying in places where Volkswagen can be photographed. You think that's all he has?

Za also has a Pagani Huayra,. Let's find out for ourselves.

All right, so don't blow Zuckerberg as much as you can in the future. American liberals have abandoned him and are now writing articles to hack him. Now you can't keep up with the trend of America's noble pursuit.

Then the respondent threw out a so-called young American value: what you did was much more important than the money you made for it.

Then I sent an article about the so-called Chinese parents:

The article is very emotional, but it is very speechless. This high-flying gesture is quite disgusting.

I would like to make a few personal comments on this. China is a country with a lot of natural disaster, and has grown up a lot of volunteers in all kinds of disasters. But always, some people have suggested that untrained volunteers to the disaster areas is actually a mess.

In fact, many scholars and the media have questioned the volunteer behavior of college students who have been volunteering in Africa for several months. Because you don't have the expertise, your Virgin Mary passion can only satisfy your desire to be a good man. It is of no help to the local people. Look for a few headings below, we can also look for their own.

The so-called mother also mentioned that his son was sponsored by the Clinton Foundation. Ha ha ha。 Well, congratulations.

It is not noble for American college students to go to Africa to browse their resumes, and the Chinese people have the same noble behavior, but the Chinese people do nothing but do things, and they do not write such disgusting Time line articles.

Take Sierra Leone, the Chinese have gone to Sierra Leone, but we are not going to brush resumes. We do things in good faith. Of course, such things may not be as noble as Americans in the eyes of the respondents. There's nothing we can do about it.

So there are people in the United States who talk about houses and some who don't talk about houses. There are people in China who talk about houses as well as those who don't talk about houses. There are those who don't wear famous brands in the United States, as well as those who wear famous brands. There are also people in China who do not wear or wear brand names. Some Americans go to Africa, and some Chinese go to Africa.

This has nothing to do with Chinese Americans, it is the choice of every specific person.

There is no need to represent Americans to educate Chinese people if they should have a good life. Nor is it necessary to tell the Chinese, on behalf of the Americans, what is noble and what is vulgar.

One thing we know must be vulgar, that is, condescending to educate others.

Finally, I would like to tell you that it is 2018, you can go online, and there are many people who go to the United States to study, travel and work. If you are not good at learning, don't learn the way that the public knows that the first picture, the content depends on the compilation of the writing.

QRcode:
 
 
Reply