Online hot discussion, which side do you stand?
Today I accidentally saw a complaint post, a large number of words criticized Australia's goverment inaction, unfair, "sad" recounts their own "tragic" experience.
A tear X writing "reasonable, convincing"!
Let's take a look at this article:
From the article, we can see that the "intolerable" client is a pregnant woman, but also a 30 weeks pregnant, is about to enter the due date of the mother-to-be!
The article is very individualistic. What exactly is it?
To sum up: this is a mother-to-be in Australia who went out for a ride with her boyfriend not long ago.
Driving a car without Rego, this is very illegal, the police uncle is not blind, naturally have to stop to check, no matter, the car does not have Rego this is very obvious, the result mother-to-be boyfriend did not even have a driver's license!
This is not over, no driver's license is not the point, the point is that this man is even a black man!
At that time, the police may have broken down, thought it was a small punishment, but did not expect to catch a big fish out, jumped directly into the jurisdiction of the Immigration Board.
No surprise-illegal driving, no license, black man.
The proper high-profile male friend was so high-profile that he was held in immigration custody.
Then there was this post scolding the Immigration Service and Australia, mostly from the woman's complaint: how can I let a mother-to-be who is about to be born so worried about it? Is it easy for me to have a baby? To live, to find a lawyer, to spend money, and to miss her boyfriend!
At the same time, looking for a lawyer, spending money, it seems that there is no way to get the boyfriend out.
She said bluntly: live alone in a three-story building in a large house, really lonely! Worry about boyfriend at the same time to bear high costs such as antenatal check-up fees, rent, etc., but also pay someone to take care of themselves!
To make matters worse, her boyfriend, who had previously applied for a refugee visa, could no longer escape in this way. The best way is to go back to China together!
But the mother-to-be categorically refused: the doctor said it was not easy to fly in the third trimester, and she didn't want to risk it for the safety of her child.
As for the whole post,
We can clearly understand that, according to common sense, this guy has nothing wrong with his management, bro! If this is not locked up, it can still be released, Australia may double the population in an instant, or several times!
At the bottom of this post, netizens commented:
So, some netizens concluded: after everyone treats this post as a spare meal, a mother-to-be complains about relieving stress, don't read it seriously.
But some netizens said: for humanitarian reasons, should not ignore this mother-to-be.
What do you think about this?