From childhood to adulthood, we are all educated. When we interact with people on a daily basis, we should respect the choices of others, allow others to express different views and positions, and do not casually judge others. We should not speak ill of each other or sarcasm and slander others.
After living in Australia for a long time, you will find a strange phenomenon, walking on the streets of Australia, like walking into the building of the common country, people in any country, no matter what race you come from or what kind of dress you come from. Or what way of life to adopt.
There are very few people who point your hands and feet at you and comment on them.
When Australians chat, they rarely inquire about other people's privacy or comment on people who are not present, because everyone knows that this is a basic accomplishment of doing things.
In Australia, everyone deserves respect!
Because once someone judge you casually, and speaks evil to you, and even rises to slander, that is often the beginning of unpleasantness, and sometimes it makes the libel pay a very heavy price.
Perhaps few people would have thought that in Australia, the consequences of slandering others were so serious.
Recently, the Sydney District Court handed down a verdict in which Patricia Murray, a woman living in the Manly area, was fined $120000 for sending a slanderous email to her neighbors.
As the saying goes, distant relatives are not as good as close neighbors. Neighbors who live under the same roof do not look up and see each other. What has happened to each other and actually let each other go to court?
It's going to start with that slander email.
Gary Raynor, chairman of the owners' committee of an apartment in Manly, Sydney, sent a reminder email to all owners to keep an eye on their mailboxes because of several mailbox theft in the area. Be sure to lock it up and not open it.
However, Ms. Patricia Murray, a resident living in the apartment, did not take the words "building management" seriously, and the mailbox was always open.
When the behavior was discovered by Raynor, it emailed the owner repeatedly reminding Murray to lock his mailbox.
This reminder, not only did not let the female owner understand the good intention of the property management, but thought it was a kind of "harassment".
As a result, the female owner sent an e-mail directly to other residents living in the apartment and accused Gary Raynor of being a narrow and nosy person, and repeatedly carrying on her and trying to insult her…
It is also said that, Gary Raynor's approach is a cowardly act.
Gary Raynor's lawer said the behavior of the woman resident made my client feel insulted and, as "the length of the first floor," was described by the owner as a scumbag who prevented him from looking up in front of his neighbors.
In order to give the client a clean name, we decided to sue the woman owner on court.
After the trial, court found that the contents of the email of the woman owner were seriously inconsistent with the facts!
Such libel has caused great mental harm to Mr. Gary Raynor.
Finally, the court ruled that the owner, Patricia Murray, was required to pay Gary Raynor a total of $120000 in moral damages and publicly apologized to the parties.
Just because of a slanderous email, the Australian woman was fined A $120000. It can be seen that in Australia, how serious is the consequences of judge others in Australia?
However, there is more than one incident like this.
Australian employees offered to resign, the boss was unhappy with some of the staff said bad things, the result was fined $237000.
Just last April, the Sydney court dealt with a dispute between employees and employers after Matthew, a nurse at a Chatswood kindergarten, offered to resign with his boss, who was upset for a moment. A slanderous email was sent to kindergarten parents claiming that the employee was a dishonest person and that the kindergarten had made a decision to fire the employee for the sake of their children's future.
When the parents of kindergarten received this email, they were also ignorant. Parents all said that Matthew is a good child. He has always been properly educated and caring for his children. He did not feel that the child had any integrity problems.
As a result, these parents forwarded the email to Matthew, Matthew himself, who was very angry about the content of the email. He lived near Chatswood, and most of the parents also lived here, these vicious languages. May directly destroy their own future.
This is the slander of red fruit!
Since the incident, Matthew has gradually become unhappy by a lively, energetic young man. He has been unable to think about food all day long, and finally he has been found depressed. Began to seek medical treatment.
And the culprit began with the slanderous email, and Matthew decided to pick up law's weapon and get justice from the kindergarten owner, so he sued the kindergarten owner on court.
After the relevant investigation, as well as the evidence provided by the prosecution and defense, the court held that the contents of Karen Chapman, the kindergarten operator, in sending emails to parents are not true!
Matthew's resignation was not inappropriate, and he did not violate garden rules and distort his qualifications. He is a very honest person.
In view of the psychological harm caused by the kindergarten to Matthew, the court ruled that Karen, the kindergarten operator, had to apologize to the plaintiff and pay the plaintiff expenses, including special injury and law costs, totalling $237000. This is equivalent to 1.13 million yuan.
Kindergarten owner Karen would not have thought that his temporary "relief" behavior, directly let themselves pay such a heavy price, almost was punished to lose money.
Just last year, Australia was named one of the most tolerant and inclusive countries in the world.
Harvard Business School conducted a comprehensive survey of 133 countries around the world on the basis of 53 indicators of the Social Progress Index (Social Progress Index). The results show that Australians' freedom of speech, freedom of movement and a wide range of political rights. Australia received a very high human rights score and was rated the fourth largest "socially developed country" after Finland, Canada and Denmark.
In Australia, people can live freely, regardless of appearance, occupation, wealth and freedom, with different values, no need to be forced, nor do they have to compare with each other. Everyone has his own attitude towards life. All you have to do is take care of yourself. It has nothing to do with how others live.
So you can see that Australia is the rare legal country of same-sex marriage in the world, and Sydney holds the world's largest "homosexual love Carnival parade" every year.
The homosexual love people walk down the street hand in public and sprinkle dog food from time to time.
But few people look at them with colored glasses.
So you'll see that Russell O'Grady, who has worked at McDonald's in Australia for most of his life and retired at the age of 50 at the beginning of this year.
Since 1986, Russell has been working at a McDonald's near home and won the title of honorary clerk the following year.
Two years ago, Russell worked for 30 years ago, and the owner also held Party for him especially, and many customers and friends who had come here at ordinary times, making Russell very happy.
So you'll see that in an era when airlines in other countries are generally looking at their faces, Australia's Jetstar Airlines has chosen one of the most beautiful stewardess to endorse.
In the sincere service and professional attitude, as well as the purest smile, appearance is, less important.
In Australia, you can really feel what equality is, what does a prince break the law and sin with the common people, and you and the prime minister will walk into the same supermarket to pick out the ingredients of the day.
Living in a country like this, everyone is happy and free from the bottom of their hearts, whether you're an ordinary employee or a company boss, the first word people learn is
respect!
If someone really judge you, or even slandered you, he might be punished for losing money.